semi-R2I
Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:39 am
OK, I searched and google shows only one use each of the phrases "semi-retire to india" and "semi r2i" - both in two different threads in this forum, by the way.
The "R" here is implied both in the sense of "return" and "retire"
What I am thinking is the following:
Work in the US (I will assume a US perspective, no reason why it cannot apply for other places such as UK or Canada, for example) for six months a year, and "no work" (aka similar to retired) in India for six months.
This may be possible, for instance, if you are in certain types of jobs that do not require physical presence in the US at all times.
Examples could be high-demand professions, or a highly valued individual in an organization, so that the US organization is willing to have you work on site for only six months.
Academics can certainly do this - teach only in Spring or fall, for example. High-demand pharmacists or physicians can do this, particularly in some areas such as Florida which experience a seasonal migration (or, perhaps even the originating place of such snowbirds) - you can go on an on-off schedule of 3 months, for example.
The wife and kids could be in India, kids attending school in India.
If you arrange your schedule, you can also have your family over here during the kids' summer and winter breaks (certainly the summer, possibly the winter break if kids are in the not-so-high grades) - so you can have 8 or 9 months together as a family.
This sort of lets you explore if indeed you can retire in (or return to) India. Sort of having your cake and eating it too - and pilot test if you can do a full fledge R2I later, and helps you keep the options open.
Thanks to what I learned from Bobus, this also means you can indefinitely be a non-resident, thus avoiding the higher taxes of India (but a rough calculation tells me that you are talking about a third or so more in taxes even if you become a resident).
Qns:
Any cases that you know of like this, any anecdotal evidence?
(I know of two cases - my first professor in the US, who after many years like this went back to India and is now a rather well-known administrator in India; and a pharmacist, who brought his family here once his son became of college age - the son attends college here, while the daughter started high school. But I have not spoken with either one, and have no idea of their experiences other than knowing that this happened).
What makes it work, what are the pitfalls?
My assumption is that this is quite rare.
But why? Is it lack of opportunities - or a hesitation to go on something akin to a "mommy track"?
Why don't more people, particularly those who are quite valuable to their firms and thus have the leverage, explore this option?
I can see many benefits. But what are the problems?
The "R" here is implied both in the sense of "return" and "retire"
What I am thinking is the following:
Work in the US (I will assume a US perspective, no reason why it cannot apply for other places such as UK or Canada, for example) for six months a year, and "no work" (aka similar to retired) in India for six months.
This may be possible, for instance, if you are in certain types of jobs that do not require physical presence in the US at all times.
Examples could be high-demand professions, or a highly valued individual in an organization, so that the US organization is willing to have you work on site for only six months.
Academics can certainly do this - teach only in Spring or fall, for example. High-demand pharmacists or physicians can do this, particularly in some areas such as Florida which experience a seasonal migration (or, perhaps even the originating place of such snowbirds) - you can go on an on-off schedule of 3 months, for example.
The wife and kids could be in India, kids attending school in India.
If you arrange your schedule, you can also have your family over here during the kids' summer and winter breaks (certainly the summer, possibly the winter break if kids are in the not-so-high grades) - so you can have 8 or 9 months together as a family.
This sort of lets you explore if indeed you can retire in (or return to) India. Sort of having your cake and eating it too - and pilot test if you can do a full fledge R2I later, and helps you keep the options open.
Thanks to what I learned from Bobus, this also means you can indefinitely be a non-resident, thus avoiding the higher taxes of India (but a rough calculation tells me that you are talking about a third or so more in taxes even if you become a resident).
Qns:
Any cases that you know of like this, any anecdotal evidence?
(I know of two cases - my first professor in the US, who after many years like this went back to India and is now a rather well-known administrator in India; and a pharmacist, who brought his family here once his son became of college age - the son attends college here, while the daughter started high school. But I have not spoken with either one, and have no idea of their experiences other than knowing that this happened).
What makes it work, what are the pitfalls?
My assumption is that this is quite rare.
But why? Is it lack of opportunities - or a hesitation to go on something akin to a "mommy track"?
Why don't more people, particularly those who are quite valuable to their firms and thus have the leverage, explore this option?
I can see many benefits. But what are the problems?