National Skills Registry - by NASSCOM
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:09 pm
hi all,
i just found out that NASSCOM in India has started a National "Skills" registry where it is trying (and succeeding) to register all IT employees in India. Many big companies have already joined this registry meaning their employees' information is in this db already!
The reason for creating this "SKILLS" registry? Security! - this is the official answer provided by NASSCOM - but I wonder why they named it as skills registry though! If I have misgivings about government holding my private data (my skills, employment history, etc) - why should my information be kept in this PRIVATE database?
here are the salient features as listed in their website (https://nationalskillsregistry.com/):
# All Indian employees will be registered - !!!!
# No new employee will be hired without being a part of the registry - So it becomes compulsary if you need a job in private IT companies.
# The data is 'owned by the employee'. Only the employee can authorise a potential employer to view his/her information. Confidentiality and privacy are, thus, assured.
- This is the biggest joke! I dont have control over whether I have to be in this db or not! If I have to be in private IT companies in India I have to provide my information (see above). Then how do I own the data? The only control I have? - to start my own company or join a govt organisation.
# No employer can, on their own, add anything to the registry except purely factual data. - how is this "purely factual data" defined? as recorded by my manager, my peers? How can I ask a question to my manager knowing that he can write "asked too many questions" in this registry?
# Employers and employees can request for background checks by reputed agencies, with employees being able to view the results of the checks - They are going to run background check on employees in the name of security. OK, but is it possible for any employee to find out how secure the prospective company is? what about racial, sexual harresment history in company. What about the list of any IT frauds, outstanding cases, etc against the company?
If i sound paranoid, please think twice. This is just the start . All big companies have already joined this registry (including dell, ibm, tcs, infosys, wipro, etc). Private companies are finally showing their true colours and are proving that they are out to get money anyway. if they can get it by blackmailing employees by holding their private information, they are ready to do it.
What do I see as a solution? Unions. As our US IT colleagues are realising now, having unions and protecting our interests is the only way to fight back.
and for those who hate unions (convinced by the continued attack on unions by press/media - which are owned by big companies), please remember that 5 day work week, 8 hour work day are all products of labour movements and unions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_hour_day). Before the labour movement, private companies were exploiting workers - and the story remains the same today. also what is NASSCOM if not a union of IT company owners? If they can form a union, why cant we?
i just found out that NASSCOM in India has started a National "Skills" registry where it is trying (and succeeding) to register all IT employees in India. Many big companies have already joined this registry meaning their employees' information is in this db already!
The reason for creating this "SKILLS" registry? Security! - this is the official answer provided by NASSCOM - but I wonder why they named it as skills registry though! If I have misgivings about government holding my private data (my skills, employment history, etc) - why should my information be kept in this PRIVATE database?
here are the salient features as listed in their website (https://nationalskillsregistry.com/):
# All Indian employees will be registered - !!!!
# No new employee will be hired without being a part of the registry - So it becomes compulsary if you need a job in private IT companies.
# The data is 'owned by the employee'. Only the employee can authorise a potential employer to view his/her information. Confidentiality and privacy are, thus, assured.
- This is the biggest joke! I dont have control over whether I have to be in this db or not! If I have to be in private IT companies in India I have to provide my information (see above). Then how do I own the data? The only control I have? - to start my own company or join a govt organisation.
# No employer can, on their own, add anything to the registry except purely factual data. - how is this "purely factual data" defined? as recorded by my manager, my peers? How can I ask a question to my manager knowing that he can write "asked too many questions" in this registry?
# Employers and employees can request for background checks by reputed agencies, with employees being able to view the results of the checks - They are going to run background check on employees in the name of security. OK, but is it possible for any employee to find out how secure the prospective company is? what about racial, sexual harresment history in company. What about the list of any IT frauds, outstanding cases, etc against the company?
If i sound paranoid, please think twice. This is just the start . All big companies have already joined this registry (including dell, ibm, tcs, infosys, wipro, etc). Private companies are finally showing their true colours and are proving that they are out to get money anyway. if they can get it by blackmailing employees by holding their private information, they are ready to do it.
What do I see as a solution? Unions. As our US IT colleagues are realising now, having unions and protecting our interests is the only way to fight back.
and for those who hate unions (convinced by the continued attack on unions by press/media - which are owned by big companies), please remember that 5 day work week, 8 hour work day are all products of labour movements and unions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_hour_day). Before the labour movement, private companies were exploiting workers - and the story remains the same today. also what is NASSCOM if not a union of IT company owners? If they can form a union, why cant we?